Home to nearly 3 million Palestinians, the land makes up a critical part of any future independent state of Palestine. He’s also talked about annexing the Jordan Valley, which is a very specific part of the West Bank. Obviously, there’s a lot of other stuff going on that’s kind of occupying the Trump administration, certainly its domestic energy. U.S. Right, that’s a good question. For the Palestinians — and when I say Palestinians, I mean Fatah, the PLO, the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank; Hamas [which controls the Gaza Strip] is obviously a different issue — to now pull apart, sure, they could. Israel would annex part of the West Bank, and the Palestinians would get some part of Israel. I think there’s probably a convergence of factors. He’s a partner with Netanyahu. And so people who will participate in the political arena or people who vote are aware of this. That’s kind of been his rallying cry ever since he got involved in national politics. In Israeli history specifically, we know that on big security-related issues, sometimes the public will turn around and end up supporting policies that they didn’t support before if the leaders simply implement them and then just move ahead. One could argue that’s a positive thing because there’s lots of room to hash out some kind of agreement. Blue and White sees itself as a vehicle for doing its own thing. The Trump administration started to waffle a little bit. And then that was replaced by this miracle: Israel didn’t just win [the 1967 war], but it was a stunning victory. ", "Hayamin Hehadash Calls to Annex Part of West Bank, Grant Citizenship to Palestinian Residents", "West Bank annexations must come in context of Palestinian state, White House tells Israel", "Netanyahu: Palestinians in Israeli-annexed Jordan Valley won't get citizenship", "Annexation will not happen on July 1 - US news", "Haaretz Poll: 42% of Israelis Back West Bank Annexation, Including Two-state Supporters", "Lapid: Yesh Atid party will topple gov't that attempts annexation", "Annexing Parts of the West Bank Area C: An Israeli National Interest", "What would Israel annexing the West Bank mean", "Senators Sanders, Warren push resolution decrying PM's West Bank annexation idea", "Trump formally recognises Israeli sovereignty over Golan Heights", "With softening of US settlement policy, is annexation train leaving the station? However, since this was a throwaway remark made without addressing the international opposition to such an action, it is unclear whether Netanyahu intends to follow through. But I wouldn’t say Trump’s waffling is “nerve-racking” for Netanyahu. What I’m trying to say is there is a risk of this when it comes to annexation, but as well as on other issues. But then that date came and went, and annexation didn’t happen. As part of a final peace deal, Israelis and Palestinians would negotiate what to do about the settlements, with some heavily populated blocs near Israel’s recognized borders likely to be ceded to Israel. That includes a whole series of factors. Annexation of the West Bank would be condemned as illegal by the United Nations and would break international law. [31] However, both parties support annexation of the settlement blocs after a permanent resolution of the conflict has been negotiated. Do I have that right? On the one hand, that sounds good, because that means Palestinians have access to Israeli institutions, and those institutions can push the government to change its policies. But at this point, it’s not really an option for the political right in Israel. So there’s a difference between the US not supporting it and the US opposing it. For others, like the J-Street types, or what we call “liberal Zionists,” it’s a fight that’s worth continuing. I know I’m not really answering the question, but I think it depends. Why does the plan seem to be stalling? [42] Gantz also announced that he would prefer that the Israeli government deal with the COVID-19 pandemic first. 27% wanted to annex the entire West Bank including 16% who opposed granting political rights to Palestinians and 11% who favored granting political rights. ", "Netanyahu vows to annex "all the settlements" in West Bank". The right and the center-right are dominant in Israel. It might not be, “We are now going to choose to occupy 50 percent of the West Bank.” It might be, “We are now formally going to annex these settlements,” or the Jordan Valley, or even some smaller step. In part that’s because the Arab states have lost interest in the Israeli-Palestinian issue because there’s a whole host of other things going on. Aug. 13, 2020 . First of all, the ambiguity creates space for the Israeli government under Netanyahu to get away with almost anything. The two-state solution isn’t really dead, and we really won’t know it’s dead until we know. So as a general rule, the landscape, or the context, is that most Israeli Jews think that the West Bank is, at least in some general sense, part of Israel. What’s the deal with Benny Gantz?
Ministère Des Affaires étrangères Acte De Naissance, Horaire Prière Février 2021 Paris, Apbif Calendrier 2021, Manizha Sangin Youtube, Mosquée Belgique Ouverture, Compteur Linky Eteint Plus De Courant, Le Caire Hotel, Gâcher En Anglais, La Terre Des Pharaons Uptobox, Nerf Sensitif De La Peau, Dedacciai Parabolica Uno Clip On Bars,